Court documents detail an alleged two-pronged scheme to fix prices for broiler chickens. The first part of the scheme involved curtailing the supply of chickens “…via unprecedented cuts at the top of the supply chain in the form of jointly and collusively reducing “breeder flocks” that produce chickens ultimately slaughtered for meat consumption.”
The second part of the scheme involved manipulation of broiler chicken prices on the Georgia Dock by a group identified in court documents as the “Georgia Dock Defendants” — Pilgrim’s Pride, Tyson, Fieldale Farms, Perdue, Sanderson Farms, Koch Foods, Claxton Poultry, Harrison Poultry, Mar-Jac and Wayne Farms.
“Senior executives from eight of the ten Georgia Dock Defendants were members of a secretive “Georgia Dock Advisory Board,” which played a role in the compilation and manipulation of the Georgia Dock benchmark price,” court documents state.
In December 2016, the Georgia Dept. of Agriculture (GDA) suspended the Georgia Dock after national news reports cast doubt on the validity of the price index, and the US Dept. of Agriculture stopped including the index in its market news reports when public the affairs director for the GDA expressed his concerns about the Georgia Dock in a department memo in which he called the Georgia Dock “a flawed product that is a liability to the Georgia Department of Agriculture.”
Both prongs of the conspiracy were enabled by a market vulnerable to collusion, the defendants allege, due to factors such as “…a highly concentrated market dominated by vertically integrated producers; high barriers to market entry; a standardized, commodity product where competition is based principally on price; inelastic demand for the product; numerous opportunities for cartel members to conspire through a number of regularly scheduled trade association meetings; and access to competitors’ data through Agri Stats,” according to court documents.
The lawsuit alleges that Agri Stats participated and actively facilitated communications among the poultry companies and provided the data to enable the conspiracy. Additionally, the poultry companies began cutting supplies of broiler chickens after publicly discussing the impact of oversupply on the poultry industry and urging unified action. The complaint states that poultry companies named in the lawsuit used other strategies to “reinforce their conspiracy.”
The plaintiffs in the case also argue that the statute of limitations does apply because the plaintiffs didn’t know about the conspiracy until 2016. Court documents state that the distributors and grocers “…were compelled to pay, and did pay, artificially inflated prices for chickens during the relevant period. As a direct and proximate consequence of Defendants’ and Agri Stats’ … described wrongful conduct, Plaintiffs sustained substantial losses and damage to their businesses and property in the form of overcharges for chickens.”
The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages and attorneys’ fees in an amount to be determined at trial.
The case is Action Meat Distributors, Inc. et al v. Norman W. Fries, Inc., d/b/a Claxton Poultry Farms, Inc. et al, case number 1:18-cv-03471, in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.