Varied menu can satisfy all income levels

by Meat&Poultry Staff
Share This:

CHICAGO – Approximately twice as many affluent versus working consumers (50 versus 27 percent) use foodservice more than once a week, according to Chicago-based Technomic. Greater disposable income coupled with time pressures prompt affluent consumers to look for convenient, high-quality meal options, which are oftentimes trendy, new foodservice fare. But affluent consumers are only a small share of the total foodservice market.

Monthly patronage at fast-casual restaurants and coffee shops skew to affluent and upper-middle income groups. However, fast-food restaurant patronage is comparable among all groups. Meanwhile, upper-middle and affluent consumers are far more likely than their working and lower-middle counterparts to visit full-service restaurants once or more a month.

To appeal to economically diverse foodservice consumers, restaurants impose a varied menu, says Darren Tristano, executive vice president of Technomic.

“On one side of the menu there are products that appeal to price-sensitive customers e.g., dollar menus. Lower-priced items can retain customer patronage and possibly lead to trading up at future visits. In contrast, you’ve got items that appeal to customers who see price as a secondary factor. They may be trading down from an expensive restaurant but still want some higher-end menu options. Most of the menu, however, focuses on your core products. Now you have something for everyone.”

Findings in Technomic’s new Influence of Income Consumer Trend Report include:

• Forty-three percent of affluent consumers compared to 27 percent of working consumers prefer restaurants offering new or innovative flavors and ingredients.

• Takeout usage skews to lower-income consumers; 58 percent of affluent consumers' foodservice occasions are for dine-in, compared to 42 percent of working consumers’ foodservice occasions.

• Forty-one percent of affluent consumers versus 30 percent of working consumers say loyalty and rewards programs can encourage them to visit specific restaurants instead of others.

• Traditional health claims that relate to calorie and fat content, such as low-calorie, low trans-fat and low-fat resonate most strongly with upper-middle income consumers. Meanwhile, health-halo terms such as ‘local,’ ‘seasonal’ and ‘premium’ are most appealing to affluent consumers, most likely because they relate to the overall quality of the item — and often a higher price point.

Comment on this Article
We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.



The views expressed in the comments section of Meat and Poultry News do not reflect those of Meat and Poultry News or its parent company, Sosland Publishing Co., Kansas City, Mo. Concern regarding a specific comment may be registered with the Editor by clicking the Report Abuse link.