Don't tax fast-food, soft drinks: poll

by Bryan Salvage
Share This:
NEW YORK — Cities and states throughout he U.S. have been considering taxing both soft drinks and fast-food as one way to deter obesity. Although certain groups may be in favor of imposing this "obesity tax," consumers, in general, are not. More than half of Americans (56%) are opposed to this tax going into effect with two in five (42%) being strongly opposed. Three in 10 (31%) support this tax being imposed.

These findings are among others found in a new Adweek Media/Harris Poll, survey of 2,140 U.S. adults surveyed online April 23-27 by Harris Interactive.

People who live in the East are the most supportive of the tax on soft drinks and fast-food with 42% supporting it and just half opposing it, followed by those in the West where 35% support it and 53% oppose the "obesity tax." But just one-quarter of those who live in the South (25%) support the tax while three in five (61%) oppose it. Midwesterners are not that different from those in the South, as 28% of them support the "obesity tax" and 57% oppose it.

The youngest U.S. adults are those most likely to support the tax on soft drinks and fast-food. Two in five respondents aged 18-34 (41%) support this tax and 42% oppose it, but 17% are not at all sure. Baby Boomers are most opposed as two-thirds of those aged 45-54 (68%) oppose this tax while only 24% support it.

Just one-quarter of those with a household income between $35,000 and $49,999 (25%) and under $35,000 (27%) support this tax compared to two in five of those with a household income of $75,000 a year or more (39%).

More educated people are more likely to support a tax on fast-food and soft drinks. One-quarter of those with a high school education or less (24%) support the "obesity tax" compared to 34% of those who have attended some college and 41% of those with at least a college degree.
Comment on this Article
We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.

 

 


The views expressed in the comments section of Meat and Poultry News do not reflect those of Meat and Poultry News or its parent company, Sosland Publishing Co., Kansas City, Mo. Concern regarding a specific comment may be registered with the Editor by clicking the Report Abuse link.