GMO labeling bill heads to the president

by Jay Sjerven and Jeff Gelski
Share This:
Search for similar articles by keyword: [Biotechnology], [GMOs]

 Campbell's Spaghetti-O's with GMO label
Food manufacturers will be required to disclose the presence of bioengineered ingredients in one of three ways.

WASHINGTON — The US House of Representatives passed by a vote of 306 to 117 a bill that establishes mandatory, nationwide labeling requirements for food products containing bioengineered ingredients. The Senate passed the bill by a 63 to 30 vote on July 7. The bill was sent to President Barack Obama for his signature. It was expected the president will sign the bill into law.

The bill nullifies the Vermont mandatory GMO labeling law that took effect July 1. The bill requires food manufacturers to disclose the presence of bioengineered ingredients in one of three ways: text on the package, a symbol on the package or a link to a web site (a quick response code or similar technology).

The Grocery Manufacturers Association, the American Soybean Association and the International Dairy Foods Association also praised the House’s action.

Pamela G. Bailey, Grocery Manufacturers Association
Pamela G. Bailey, CEO, Grocery Manufacturers Association

“It is remarkable to see broad and bipartisan majorities in both the House and Senate come together to pass this GMO disclosure legislation,” said Pamela G. Bailey, president and CEO of the Washington-based Grocery Manufacturers Association. “Republicans and Democrats found consensus on the common ground that a patchwork of different state labeling laws would be a costly and confusing disaster for the nation’s food supply chain. They also joined together to give consumers more access to consistent and helpful information about genetic engineering.”

The Center for Food Safety, Washington, and Jesse L. Jackson Sr., president and founder of the Chicago-based Rainbow PUSH Coalition, criticized the bill.

“Many groups, including the Center for Food Safety, have likewise condemned the bill that exempts major portions of current and future GMO foods from labeling and is discriminatory against low-income, rural, minorities and elderly populations,“ said the Center for Food Safety, a national non-profit public interest and environmental advocacy organization. “The bill as written is also a gross violation of the sovereignty of numerous states, as it preempts the genetically engineered food labeling laws in Vermont, Connecticut, Maine and Alaska.”

Jackson sent a letter dated July 14 to President Obama.

“The GMO labeling law's principal thrust is to rely on QR codes (quick response codes) which shoppers will scan to gain product information relative to GMOs,” he said in the letter. “However, 100,000,000 Americans, most of them poor, people of color and elderly, either do not own a smart phone or an iPhone to scan the QR code or live in an area of poor internet connectivity. There are serious questions of discrimination presented here and unresolved matters of equal protection of the law. I am asking you to veto this bill and to send it back to Congress with instructions to correct this fatal flaw.”

Comment on this Article
We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.



The views expressed in the comments section of Meat and Poultry News do not reflect those of Meat and Poultry News or its parent company, Sosland Publishing Co., Kansas City, Mo. Concern regarding a specific comment may be registered with the Editor by clicking the Report Abuse link.


By Tim Opiela 7/15/2016 8:33:27 PM
Mr. Jackson..This bill should be signed for two reasons. 1. Grocery stores have scanners for consumers to check a problem with a product. When was the last or shall I say the first time you have ever returned a recall product yourself to a store for a refund? 2. Are there not federal " Free fund phone programs" for low income. 3. Delays in having this bill signed are adversely effecting the health and health care costs of this demographic group.

By Anthony 7/15/2016 10:00:22 AM
It's great to label the products that contain GMO, right to know is important, it is insane to say it's discriminatory because it is not listed now, label laws change as information and science change, there is no discrimination against anyone here