Poultry modernization legislation moves ahead

by Bryan Salvage
Share This:
Search for similar articles by keyword: [Chicken]
WASHINGTON -- Its proposed rule to modernize the US poultry inspection system has been sent by the US Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service to the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review. The US poultry industry has reacted favorably to this move.

"I commend USDA for taking the next step in an effort to modernize the way the agency inspects chicken," said Mike Brown, NCC president. "In an effort to continue our progress towards reducing foodborne illnesses, we believe, along with food safety experts, that the poultry inspection system should be modernized and transitioned to a model that is more science and risk-based. Not only will this system build on our food safety progress, if fully implemented, it will create jobs."We look forward to reviewing the final rule in its entirety once it is published in the Federal Register. After a successful 15-year pilot program, I urge OIRA to perform an expeditious review."

Meanwhile, Joel Brandenberger, president of the National Turkey Federation, said the turkey industry is committed to working with the USDA to implement logical steps in modernizing the US food-safety inspection system to ensure it remains the world’s best.

“Because draft documents under review are considered deliberative and not available for public release, NTF has not seen the final rule, but did submit comments in support of the proposed rule,” he added. “That draft detailed a modern, sensible approach that will allow food safety inspectors to focus more closely on public health. Further, it described a revamped inspection system that would allow federal inspectors to shift to prevention-oriented inspection systems and redeploy resources in a manner that better protects the public from foodborne diseases.

The turkey industry strives to ensure that consumers continue to enjoy turkey products with full confidence in its safety, he continued. “These actions, together with scientifically-based regulatory actions will affect positive results in the regulated poultry establishments. NTF urges the Office of Budget and Management to provide a high priority review for this important regulation,” he concluded.

FSIS estimated that if implemented, this modernized system would prevent more than 5,200 foodborne illnesses every year. OIRA's review of the rule is the last step before the rule becomes final and published in the Federal Register. The rule was proposed in Jan. 27, 2012, and the comment period closed May 29, 2012.
In other news, the National Chicken Council has launched a new, informative website – www.ChickenInspectionFacts.com – which was designed for consumers and the media to help them better understand both the traditional and modernized inspection processes. Featured in the website are a video of a chicken processing line; video testimonials from food safety, veterinary and poultry processing experts; a Myths & Facts section; a timeline; and several infographics and diagrams.

"In an attempt to save a few federal union jobs that have proven unnecessary over the past 15 years, the inspectors union and their allies have spread many misconceptions about this inspection system and chicken processing in general," Brown charged. "We hope this new website will serve as both an educational tool and resource. After learning the facts, I'm sure taxpayers want their hard earned tax dollars going towards federal inspectors performing tasks like testing for Salmonella, instead of cutting broken wings off of chicken carcasses."

Last December, a bipartisan group of 13 U.S. senators from both sides of the aisle sent a letter to USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack urging him to move forward with the proposal.

About the modernized system
Under the proposed rule, USDA remains in its oversight role and USDA inspectors will still be in every poultry plant, looking at each chicken to ensure the safety of chicken products and providing them with the USDA seal of approval for wholesomeness.

The voluntary change would allow trained plant employees to check carcasses for defects and perform other quality-assurance tasks not related to food safety. That would free up some federal inspectors to focus more on food safety-related tasks, such as oversight and verification, microbiological testing for pathogens like Salmonella, sanitation standards and antimicrobial controls in the plant.

This system has been in place as a pilot in 20 chicken plants for the past 15 years, and has proven tremendously successful at improving food safety and protecting workers.
The new system, as proposed, would be voluntary for chicken processors.
For more information, visit: www.ChickenInspectionFacts.com.
Comment on this Article
We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.

The views expressed in the comments section of Meat and Poultry News do not reflect those of Meat and Poultry News or its parent company, Sosland Publishing Co., Kansas City, Mo. Concern regarding a specific comment may be registered with the Editor by clicking the Report Abuse link.


By concerned 7/12/2014 1:52:17 AM
excerpt from USDA.gov Progress Report on Salmonella and Campylobacter Testing of Raw Meat and Poultry Products, CY 1998-2011 SE Percent Positive by Calendar Year ( Figure C1): The SE percent positive ranged from a low of 0.88% in 2007 to a high of 1.78% during calendar year 2011. Initially, FSIS experienced a decrease in the SE percent positive in 2007 as compared to 2006 and then the percent positive either increased or remained steady through 2011. Of the 37,476 samples, FSIS found 495 positives (1.32%).

By Really Concerned 7/11/2014 5:03:58 PM
Tighter standards for Salmonella does not matter if the enforcement is lacking. Don't be confused by the Government spin. SIP programs have many loopholes and as long as it "SEEMS" the plant is getting the Salmonella back under control due to some silver bullet program they dreamed up, the Inspectors hand's are tied. Remember, it is the Government "Appointed" Supervision that wants less inspectors due to management controlling the interpretation of these studies for economic reasons; not at all for food safety reasons. What do they care, take the money and run...

By Salmonella 7/11/2014 2:48:15 PM
Concerned, I guess you do not truely understand the systems in place. The plants that are under HIMP have tighter Salmonella standards than the non-himp plants becasue they are running under a SIP waiver. Please troll some where else

By concerned 7/11/2014 12:26:19 PM
Could someone publish the names and statistics on salmonella from those 20 pilot plants?