AMI's Boyle writes letter about GIPSA proposal

by Meat&Poultry Staff
Share This:
WASHINGTON – "The tremendous progress of America's meat and poultry industry is in jeopardy due to a proposed rule from USDA's Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA),” charges AMI President and CEO, J. Patrick Boyle, in a letter to the editor in a recent issue of the Des Moines Register.

The proposed rule would adversely affect the use of marketing agreements by livestock producers and processors because of a threat of legal jeopardy, Boyle explains.

“These agreements were initiated by producers and have been mutually beneficial to producers and processors. In addition, these agreements benefit consumers, who enjoy a consistent, quality product because processors are better able to procure the types of livestock that yield those products,” he said.

It is troubling that the proposed rule lacks a comprehensive economic-impact analysis, a fact that has been criticized in writing by nearly 115 members of Congress, including Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley and Reps. Steve King and Tom Latham, Boyle points out.

“An economic-impact study found the rule would cost Iowa more than 3,700 jobs and cost the state $630 million in economic activity,” he explained, adding that nationwide, the US would lose 104,000 jobs and approximately $14 billion in total revenue.

“That is why AMI and the country's largest livestock producer groups have called for the proposed rule to be withdrawn,” he said.
Comment on this Article
We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.

 

 


The views expressed in the comments section of Meat and Poultry News do not reflect those of Meat and Poultry News or its parent company, Sosland Publishing Co., Kansas City, Mo. Concern regarding a specific comment may be registered with the Editor by clicking the Report Abuse link.