N.P.P.C. requests more time to consider G.I.P.S.A. proposal

by Meat&Poultry staff
Share This:

WASHINGTON – The National Pork Producers Council has asked to extend the comment period on a proposed federal rule that could limit pork producers’ options in selling pigs to processors. N.P.P.C. urged a 120-day extension of the comment period, which currently is set to expire Aug. 23, in a letter to J. Dudley Butler, administrator of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration.

N.P.P.C. said the proposed rule would implement parts of the 2008 Farm Bill related to livestock and poultry contracts, including establishing criteria under the Packers and Stockyards Act for what constitutes providing or giving undue or unreasonable preference or advantage in a contract.

After a preliminary review, N.P.P.C. said the proposed rule goes well beyond the parameters set out in the Farm Bill, specifically with regard to sections on “unfairness,” purchasing practices, contracts, “competitive injury” and recordkeeping.

“Our initial reading of the proposed rule is that it is overly broad and very vague,” said N.P.P.C. president Sam Carney, a pork producer from Adair, Iowa. “We need more than 60 days to determine all of the ramifications this regulation could have on America’s 67,000 pork producers.”

The scope of the proposed rule and the lack of an adequate economic analysis of its impact on the livestock industry warrant an extension of the 60-day comment period, NPPC said. The organization also pointed out that the Aug. 23 comment deadline is four days before the next U.S.D.A.-Department of Justice workshop on competition in the livestock industry.

Public comments from that event in Ft. Collins, Colo., as well as ones from the final Dec. 8 workshop in Washington, D.C., should be considered before finalizing a rule, N.P.P.C. concluded.

Comment on this Article
We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.

 

 


The views expressed in the comments section of Meat and Poultry News do not reflect those of Meat and Poultry News or its parent company, Sosland Publishing Co., Kansas City, Mo. Concern regarding a specific comment may be registered with the Editor by clicking the Report Abuse link.