Motion backs professor's testimony in litter case

by Bryan Salvage
Share This:

TULSA, OKLA. — Opinions by one of the state's expert witnesses in a poultry-litter pollution trial are based on sound science and weren't developed by attorneys to fit the lawsuit, said Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson in a recent court filing. Mr. Edmondson refutes in a 109-page document filed May 26 in federal court a motion filed by 13 Arkansas poultry companies seeking to exclude the testimony of Valerie Harwood, according to The Associated Press.

Mr. Edmondson wants to use Ms. Harwood as a witness in Oklahoma's 2005 lawsuit against the poultry companies over allegedly polluting the 1 million-acre Illinois River watershed with poultry waste. She claims to have identified a poultry litter-specific "biomarker," and reportedly traced a path that contamination from poultry waste travels from fields into the watershed.

A trial is expected to begin in September.

Comment on this Article
We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.



The views expressed in the comments section of Meat and Poultry News do not reflect those of Meat and Poultry News or its parent company, Sosland Publishing Co., Kansas City, Mo. Concern regarding a specific comment may be registered with the Editor by clicking the Report Abuse link.